Tuesday, May 31, 2011

When One Team Member Is Ruining Your Team

This is a great question - which I just reviewed from another blog. I hope that my answer is helpful:

- My first suggestion is to work on improving the team behavior of every team member. In this way, the one person you are having problems with won't feel 'singled out' by you.

- Have each team member ask each other team member a simple question: "In the future, how can I do a great job of helping our team demonstrate effective teamwork?"

- Encourage each team member to be positive and focused in their replies to other team members.

- Encourage each team member to listen to, learn from, and express gratitude for these suggestions.

- Have each team member discuss what they have learned from the other team members with you - in a one-on-one dialogue.

- Provide your ideas - as the manager of the team -- after you have heard the summary of the other suggestions from this person's team members.

- Ask each person to commit to following up with fellow team members on their plan for improvement to get ongoing suggestions and reinforcement.

- Participate in the process yourself - so that you are 'leading by example' not just 'leading by preaching at everyone else.'

This series of suggestions will work if the person you are trying to help has issues that are behavioral, is willing to try, and will be given a fair chance by the other team members. If the person is unwilling to try, or has a sarcastic or cynical attitude toward change, this won't work.

If she has this bad attitude, tell her that a change in behavior is critically important. Let her know that you want to help her however you can - but that she is going to have to make the effort to improve. If she still doesn't care, either fire her or, if she is a critical individual contributor who can function well without team interaction, have her work alone.

Life is good.

Marshall

My newest book, MOJO, is a New York Times (advice), Wall Street Journal (business), USAToday (money) and Publisher's Weekly (non-fiction) best seller. It is now available online and at major bookstores.

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithLibrary.com

#MOJOtweet

http://www.LeadingNews.org

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithFeedForward.com

Marshall's Upcoming Schedule

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Action Learning: A Recipe For Success

I have observed one leadership development process that builds leaders and helps companies make money at the same time - action learning. After seeing how action learning worked at GE and IBM, I am surprised that more companies don't do it. My friend, Chris Cappy, has spent years in GE, IBM and other major companies implementing action learning. I will let Chris describe the basics of how this process works:

The essence of action learning involves working through real problems, reviewing both the results achieved and then analyzing the process by which these results were achieved. Action learning is a structured process with four essential elements:

1. Creating an experience that engages learners - that 'stretches' the leaders involved in the process and adds real value to the company.

2. Debriefing the experience - reviewing what happened both from a 'results' and 'process' perspective.

3. Generalizing from results - understanding not just what happened, but knowing what the results mean for leaders and the company.

4. Transferring lessons to the future - applying key learnings in a way that helps the participants in the process become better leaders and the company become more successful in meeting related challenges.

The validity of the action learning process is well-grounded in research on how adults learn -- which is predominantly via on-the-job "real-time" experiences. Sound action learning design provides a stage upon which behavioral performance dynamics can be observed and critiqued, and from which new choices and behavioral improvements can emerge.

In the past, there has been a continuum of applications for leadership development under the "action learning" banner, ranging from experiential challenge simulations to design of business-based performance projects. I have seen the impact that comes from using 'real' business challenges.

When participants deal with serious business issues, there are real consequences for failure. They realize that this is not 'just a game' and get serious about what they are doing. The more relevant the challenge - the higher the stakes - the more leaders are stretched - the more they learn!

If developing talented leaders were viewed a cooking school, and action learning were a recipe, here would be my basic list of ingredients for our leader-learners to be and do better:

- Find a real, substantial project that is "in plan" and important...there are visible consequences if failure occurs.

- Add in some individual performance feedback that's relevant to the company/context in which they work.

- Bring together a group of learner-leaders and help them to know each other as colleagues and brothers/sisters in arms who can support one another.

- Provide ample time for their work to "cook," and check on their progress periodically. Use online support aids to keep attention.

- Add in some simple tools for leading change and judiciously sprinkle in some coaching to help them play their parts well. Keep the lights up. Having other leader-actors to provide coaching is remarkably effective when the stage has been properly set.

- Now and then, stir the pot with some executives or Board members or key customers who can tell their stories as a way of supporting the show.

- Stage a grand finale performance where results are served up and shared...something like the Iron Chef of leadership development.

- And, of course, you season to taste, and cook until done -- as with all recipes, there are many examples of action learning designs, ranging from quite mild to very hot!

When you combine these basic ingredients, you can really help people to be and do better. Beyond the knowledge gained, we also see relationships formed that significantly support cross-boundary collaboration that are positioned to address whatever business opportunities and challenges emerge.

Life is good.

Marshall

My newest book, MOJO, is a New York Times (advice), Wall Street Journal (business), USAToday (money) and Publisher's Weekly (non-fiction) best seller. It is now available online and at major bookstores.

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithLibrary.com

#MOJOtweet

http://www.LeadingNews.org

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithFeedForward.com

Marshall's Upcoming Schedule

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

To Develop Others, Start With Yourself

Listen to what General Mills CEO Steve Sanger recently told 90 of his colleagues: 'As you all know, last year my team told me that I needed to do a better job of coaching my direct reports. I just reviewed my 360- degree feedback. I have been working on becoming a better coach for the past year or so. I'm still not doing as well as I want, but I'm getting a lot better. My coworkers have been helping me improve. I'm pleased that my scores on 'effectively responds to feedback' are higher this year.' While listening to Steve speak so openly to coworkers about his efforts to develop himself as a leader, I realized how much the world has changed. Twenty years ago, few CEOs received feedback from their colleagues.

Even fewer candidly discussed that feedback and their personal development plans. Today, many of the most respected chief executives are setting a positive example by opening up, striving continually to develop themselves as leaders. In fact, organizations that best develop leaders tend to have CEOs like Steve Sanger who are directly and actively involved in leadership development. That has certainly been my experience.

This has also been confirmed by research led by Marc Effron at Hewitt Associates, who put General Mills on his latest list of the top-20 companies for leaders.

Hewitt finds that these organizations tend to more actively manage their talent. They identify high-potential people, differentiate compensation, provide the right development opportunities, and closely watch turnover.

Vital to these efforts is CEO support and involvement.

One of the best ways top executives can get their leaders to improve is to work on improving themselves.

Leading by example can mean a lot more than leading by public-relations hype. For example, Michael Dell, whose company made the Top 20 list, could have an attitude that says, 'I don't really need to develop myself.' However, Michael sincerely discusses his personal challenges with leaders across the company. He is a living case study from whom everyone at Dell is learning. His example makes it hard for any leader to act in arrogance.

Johnson & Johnson, tied for first on the top-20 list, has successfully involved its executives in leadership development. Its CEOs, formerly Ralph Larsen and now Bill Weldon, and top executive team regularly participate in various leadership-building activities. Having a dialogue with the CEO about his business challenges and developmental needs makes it a lot easier for employees to discuss their own business challenges and developmental needs.

Executive candor can even help turn around a troubled company. For example, Northrop Grumman CEO Kent Kresa inherited a company that had a poor reputation for integrity, a battered stock price, and reputation as one of the least-admired companies. His leadership team reversed the company's poor image and engineered an amazing turnaround. From the start, Kent led by example. He communicated clear expectations for ethics, values, and behavior. He was evaluated by the same standards that he set for everyone else. He consistently reached out to coworkers. He didn't just work to develop his leaders--he created an environment in which other leaders were working to develop him.

In the same way that CEO support and involvement can help companies nurture leaders, CEO arrogance can have the opposite effect. When the boss acts with arrogance and tells everyone else they need to improve, that behavior is copied. Managers then point out how others need to change. The end result: No one gets much better.

The principle of leadership development by personal example applies to all management. All leaders want their people to grow and develop on the job. When you work hard to improve yourself, you encourage the people around you to do the same thing.

Life is good.

Marshall

My newest book, MOJO, is a New York Times (advice), Wall Street Journal (business), USAToday (money) and Publisher's Weekly (non-fiction) best seller. It is now available online and at major bookstores.

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithLibrary.com

#MOJOtweet

http://www.LeadingNews.org

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithFeedForward.com

Marshall's Upcoming Schedule

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Mission Control

On the surface, 'purpose' and 'goal' seem to be similar, if not synonymous, terms. But in parsing the definitions, we discover they're very different concepts.

- Goals are specific objectives we strive to achieve, usually within defined parameters of space, time and resources.

- Purpose is the 'why' behind any thought or deed. Purpose is not about achieving a goal--it's more of a way of life. Purpose is enduring, whereas goals can be created, adjusted and discarded.

You can see the variation between purpose and goals in what you do at work. Goals can be the targets you set regarding the recruitment, retention, development, and progression of your workforce. Purpose should be what the goals serve. You set targets to achieve a greater overarching aim, one that benefits all stakeholders. For instance, you wouldn't bring in 1,000 employees just to grow your workforce; but you might bring in 1,000 employees to ensure the success of a new growth opportunity.

We often confuse our goals with our purpose. For example, I once taught a leadership development session for executives and their spouses or partners. In the session, executives learned that their partners often felt ignored or put in 'second place' compared with work. Many executives had clearly let their goal (make a lot of money) become more important than their purpose (create a great life for themselves and their families).

The distinction between a goal and purpose can be lost on managers. For example, a friend of mine left consulting to become the VP of HR for a corporation.

He reviewed a study of their employee benefits and found some were costing the company millions of dollars and delivering little that the employees valued. When he suggested cutting the benefits to save money, he was told he was 'confused.' His boss noted that cutting these benefits would mean a smaller budget and less power for the HR department. In building their empires, they had forgotten about making a ROI for their stockholders.

Company purpose should come before departmental goals. Yet many leaders become fixated on goals in their struggle to meet tight deadlines with finite resources. The solution is simple, but not easy. It requires honest, perhaps painful, reflection. Review your goals and ask: 'What goals are consuming my time and energy and the company's resources?' Rank your goals in terms of cost to achieve. Then rank your goals in terms of contribution to purpose. When you find clear discrepancies, you need to step back and realign your goals with your purpose-- doing what really matters (and stop doing what doesn't matter).

Stop in the Name of Leadership
Once I heard Peter Drucker say: 'We teach leaders what to do. We don't teach leaders what to stop. Half the leaders I meet don't need to learn what to do.

They need to learn what to stop.' Have you ever attended a training session entitled Stupid Things We're Doing That We Need to Stop Doing? Or, has your CEO ever discussed his negative traits and his efforts to stop destructive behavior? Can you even imagine your leader admitting a fault and outlining his aim to stop doing it? Probably not. Leadership behaviors are designed to demonstrate a commitment to positive action--we will start listening to our customers (rather than stop talking about ourselves). Recognition and reward systems are designed to give credit for doing something good--not for ceasing to do something bad. Yet, they are two different sides of the same coin.

Think of times you've seen colleagues go on a sales call, return with an order, and regale anyone who'll listen with a blow-by-blow account of how they closed the deal. But what if, during that sales call, they crunched some numbers and realized they were about to agree to a deal that cost the company money? What if they decided to stop negotiating and say 'no' to the deal? Would they rush back to the office and brag about the bad deal they avoided? Hardly. Avoiding mistakes is an unseen, unheralded achievement, and yet, averting a bad deal or bad hire can affect the bottom line more than scoring a big sale. Stopping negative behaviors and actions gets no attention, but it can be as critical as anything you do.

As you evaluate your performance, consider the impact of what you are not--or should not be--doing.

Sharing Is Caring
Communication breakdowns hinder operations. Why do these lapses happen? How they can be avoided? Today, knowledge is power, which makes withholding key data very counterproductive.

Suppressing vital information lowers value. This becomes a big problem whenever people take their competitive nature too far. It's the same old need to win, only more underhanded. People take the phrase 'knowledge is power' too literally, thinking the object of the game is to hoard as much information as possible.

The problem with willfully withholding information, though, is it rarely achieves the desired effect. You might think you're gaining an edge and consolidating power, but you're breeding mistrust and disdain. To have real power, you need to inspire loyalty rather than fear and suspicion.

Often we withhold information in unintentional or accidental ways-- when we're too busy to get back to people with information they need, when we forget to include someone in our discussions or meetings, or when we delegate a task but don't show or explain to people exactly how we want the task done. If you don't see why any of that annoys people, reflect on how you feel when no one tells you about a meeting, sends you an important e-mail or memo, or makes you the last person to know about something.

Usually, we don't withhold information out of malice; rather, we do it because we're clueless (but the impact on people who are affected is similar).

Have the Courage to Ask
Peter Drucker once observed, 'The leader of the past knew how to tell; the leader of the future will know how to ask.' If you manage knowledge workers --people who know more about what they're doing than you do--you know that it is hard to tell them what to do and how to do it! You need to ask, listen, and learn from everyone around you. As Peter stated: 'Start by asking the question, 'What needs to be done?'' Leaders who ask co-workers to provide suggestions, listen to them, learn from them, and follow-up are seen as becoming more effective. Also, external customer satisfaction goes up when customer service reps ask, listen, learn, and follow-up. When people ask you for your input, listen to you, try to learn from you and follow-up to see if they are getting better, your relationship with them invariably improves.

So, why don't leaders ask? One reason is our inflated ego. When I ask leaders to rate themselves relative to their peers, about 60 percent of them rank themselves in the top 10 percent; almost 85 percent say they are in the top 20 percent; and over 98 percent claim to be in the top half! Their performance has little to do with their self-assessment! When you become successful, you are often delusional about the reasons for your success. You tend to attribute good results to your own motivation and ability and tend to attribute poor results to environmental factors, bad luck, or random chance. When you over-rate your performance, you can easily justify not asking others for input.

A second reason why leaders don't ask is fear. Once I asked a VP of Customer Satisfaction, 'Should you be asking your key customers for feedback?' 'Of course!' he said. 'Then, why don't you do it?' He admitted, 'Because I am afraid of the answer.' As a leader, start asking key coworkers: 'What needs to be done?' Thank them for their input, listen to them, learn as much as you can, incorporate the ideas that make the most sense, and follow-up to ensure that real, positive change is occurring.

Ask, listen, and learn from everyone around you. You can learn more about what you most need to know from your key stakeholders than you can from consultants. Also, ask the people whom you love how you can be a better partner, friend, or parent. Listen to their ideas. Don't get so busy with work that you ignore the most important people in your life. To improve your relationships, you need to ask for people's opinions and then follow up and do something about what you learn.

Life is good.

Marshall

My newest book, MOJO, is a New York Times (advice), Wall Street Journal (business), USAToday (money) and Publisher's Weekly (non-fiction) best seller. It is now available online and at major bookstores.

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithLibrary.com

#MOJOtweet

http://www.LeadingNews.org

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithFeedForward.com

Marshall's Upcoming Schedule

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Self-Assessment

In the movie Wall Street, Michael Douglas won an Oscar for his portrayal of the rude, larcenous wheeler-dealer Gordon Gekko. Well, I worked with a real-life investment banker could have inspired the Gekko character.

As an executive coach, I work with supremely successful people who need to change some behaviors. The man I coached--let's call him Mike--wasn't amoral and unethical like Gekko, but he had some competitive fires that made him treat people poorly. Mike's score for treating colleagues with respect was dismal; in fact, out of 1,000 managers rated, he was dead last! But Mike put up astounding numbers with his trades. His profit contribution was so vast that the CEO promoted him into management. This should have been the apex of Mike's young career.

Instead, it exposed his bad side. The firm's leaders, who had been insulated from Mike's behavior, were suddenly getting a first-hand dose of his 'lead, follow, or get out of my way' style. In meetings, they saw that there was often no checkpoint between Mike's brain and mouth. He was surly and offensive to everyone, even to the CEO, who called me in to 'help him change now.' When I met Mike, I noticed his delight in his success. He was making more than $4 million a year, so professional validation was coursing through his veins like jet fuel. I knew that breaking through to Mike by challenging his performance would be tough. He was delivering results, and he knew it. So I told him, 'I can't help you make more money. But let's talk about your ego.

How do you treat people at home?' Mike insisted that he was a great husband and father. 'I don't bring my work home,' he assured me. 'I'm a warrior on Wall Street but a pussycat at home.'

'Is your wife home right now?'

'Yes,' he said.

'Why don't you call her and see how different she thinks you are at home?' He called his wife. She agreed that Mike was a jerk at home, too. Then he got his two kids on the line, and they agreed with their mother.

'I'm beginning to see a pattern here,' I said. 'Do you really want to have a funeral that no one attends other than for business reasons?' Mike looked stricken. 'They're going to fire me if I don't make my numbers, aren't they?' he asked.

'Not only are they going to fire you,' I said, 'but several people will be dancing in the halls when you go.' Mike reflected on that, and said, 'I'm going to change, and the reason has nothing to do with money or with this firm. I have two sons, and if they were receiving this feedback from you in 20 years, I'd be ashamed to be their father.' Within a year, Mike's scores on his treatment of people shot up past the 50th percentile, above an already high company norm. He probably deserved even better, since he started so far down in the ditch. He also doubled his income.

The lesson: Our flaws at work don't vanish at home. The moral: Anybody can change, but they have to want to change. Sometimes you can deliver that message by reaching people where they live, not where they work.

If you want to know how your behavior comes across to your colleagues and clients, stop looking in the mirror to admire yourself. Let your colleagues hold the mirror and tell you what they see. If you don't believe them, do the same with your loved ones and friends--the people in your life who are most likely to be agendafree and who truly want you to succeed. We all claim to want the truth. This is a guaranteed delivery system.

To Help Others, Start With Yourself
General Mills CEO Steve Sanger once told 90 of his colleagues: 'Last year my team told me that I needed to do a better job of coaching my direct reports. I just reviewed my 360-degree feedback. I have been working on becoming a better coach for the past year or so. I'm still not doing quite as well as I want, but I'm getting a lot better. My coworkers have been helping me improve. Also, I feel good about the fact that my scores on 'effectively responds to feedback' are so high this year.' While listening to Steve speak openly to coworkers about his efforts to develop himself, I realized how much the world has changed. Twenty years ago, few CEOs received feedback from their colleagues--or candidly discussed that feedback and their personal developmental plans. Today, many respected leaders are setting a positive example by striving to develop themselves.

Organizations that crank out great leaders tend to have CEOs like Steve Sanger who are actively involved in leadership development. These organizations tend to actively manage their talent. They identify high-potential people, differentiate compensation, serve up the right development opportunities, closely watch turnover, and offer CEO support and involvement.

One of the best ways top executives can get their leaders to improve is to work on improving themselves. Leading by example can mean a lot more than leading by public-relations hype.

- Michael Dell is a perfect example. As a successful leader, he could easily have an attitude that says, 'I am Michael Dell and you aren't! I don't need to work on developing myself.' Michael, however, has the opposite approach. He sincerely discusses his personal challenges with leaders across the company. He is a living case study from whom everyone at Dell is learning. His leadership example makes it hard for any leader to act arrogant or to communicate that he or she has nothing to improve upon.

- Johnson & Johnson has successfully involved its executives in leadership development. Its top executive team regularly participate in a variety of leadership-building activities. Having a dialogue with the CEO about his business challenges and developmental needs makes it a lot easier for employees to discuss their own business challenges and developmental needs.

- At Northrop Grumman, CEO Kent Kresa and his leadership team reversed the company's poor image and engineered an amazing turnaround. From the beginning, Kent led by example. He communicated clear expectations for ethics, values, and behavior. He made sure that he was evaluated by the same standards that he set for everyone else.

As you work hard to improve yourself, you encourage the people around you to do the same thing.

Life is good.

Marshall

My newest book, MOJO, is a New York Times (advice), Wall Street Journal (business), USAToday (money) and Publisher's Weekly (non-fiction) best seller. It is now available online and at major bookstores.

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithLibrary.com

#MOJOtweet

http://www.LeadingNews.org

http://www.MarshallGoldsmithFeedForward.com

Marshall's Upcoming Schedule